Mike Penders
GKPPoints by gameweek
9 gameweeks recorded · 0 hauls of 10+ · 2 blanks
| GW | Opponent | Pts | Min | Sv | A | CS | Bonus | BPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | MUN (H) | 6 | 90 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 |
| 8 | TOT (H) | 0 | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 7 | EVE (A) | 1 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | BOU (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | BRE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | HUL (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | ARS (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | BHA (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | FUL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Previous seasons
Points per 90 lets you compare seasons where minutes differed
| Season | Pts | Per 90 | Min | Sv | A | Bonus | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/26 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | £4.0m |
Best alternatives for the money
GKPs up to £4.9m, by expected points over the next 3 gameweeks — Penders has 2.9
Next fixtures
Expected points breakdown
What the model expects in gameweek 10
Per-90 rates scaled by expected minutes and fixture difficulty, scored against the FPL rules and blended with a form prior. How this works